![]() Particularly, the claims of Nuijten required the physical, yet transitory, embodiment of a signal, whereas claim 1 required no physical embodiment at all.Īs an aside, this is not the first time that the Federal Circuit has held that a data structure falls outside the ambit of § 101. The Court further found that claim 1 was even broader than the patent-ineligible claims of In re Nuijten, where an applicant attempted to obtain patent protection on a signal. Duryee, for the notion that "o qualify as a machine under section 101, the claimed invention must be a concrete thing, consisting of parts, or of certain devices and combination of devices." Claim 1 does not meet this standard because it recites an intangible arrangement of information, and therefore does not fall into any of the categories of § 101. The Federal Circuit observed that claim 1 is "comprised of two sets of data that describe a device dependent transformation" and that "he asserted claims are not directed to any tangible embodiment of this information ( i.e., in physical memory or other medium) or claim any tangible part of the digital processing system." Second data for describing a device de-pendent transformation of spatial in-formation content of the image in said device independent color space. Digitech appealed.Ī device profile for describing properties of a device in a digital image reproduction system to capture, transform or render an image, said device profile comprising:įirst data for describing a device de-pendent transformation of color information content of the image to a device independent color space and The presiding United States District Court for the Central District of California granted the motion. In July 2013, several defendants filed summary judgment motions, contending that Digitech's asserted claims were directed to patent-ineligible subject matter. The '415 patent relates to "the generation and use of an improved device profile that describes spatial and color properties of a device within a digital image processing system." By creating a number of such device profiles for input and output devices ( e.g., digital cameras, monitors, televisions, etc.), the patent purports to be able to more accurately translate color representations between these devices. § 101.ĭigitech sued Electronics For Imaging and a host of co-defendants for allegedly infringing its U.S. CLS Bank International, the Federal Circuit has used the holding of that case to strike down a patentee's claims under 35 U.S.C. If you've ever used a Logitech mouse, you won't be surprised to learn that the G305 handled everything I threw at it with aplomb.Less than four weeks after the Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Alice Corp. I ran the G305 through a variety of games to evaluate how well it performed, including Overwatch, StarCraft: Remastered, Pillars of Eternity II: Deadfire and World of Warcraft. Clearly, the G305 doesn't need Bluetooth, but including it would have made the mouse feel a little more robust. The USB dongle works extremely well on a computer but makes the mouse impossible to use with a smartphone, tablet or game console. #DIGITECH IPS 33 GSP5 REVIEW BLUETOOTH#Some of the mouse's competitors, such as the Razer Atheris, offer both Bluetooth and USB wireless, as do Logitech's own productivity mice. The bigger problem is that the G305 seems perfectly content to offer wireless only through a USB dongle. The wireless connectivity works flawlessly and from well over 10 feet away, in case you wanted to use the G305 in a living room setup. But you may want to invest in some rechargeable AAs. (This, of course, assumes you are using the mouse for productivity as well as gaming.) One battery each month is admittedly not a bad investment, and the lack of a built-in, rechargeable battery keeps the cost and the weight down. The company estimates that the mouse will run for 250 hours on a single charge, translating to just a bit more than a month, if you use it for 8 hours every day. Unlike some of Logitech's more expensive mice, the G305 is not rechargeable, running instead on a single AA battery (included). MORE: Our Favorite Gaming Mice for Every Genre The wireless connectivity, as far as I was able to test, works flawlessly and from well over 10 feet away, in case you wanted to use the G305 in a living room setup. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |